12 January 2022 Planning Committee – Additional Representations
|
Page |
Site Address |
Application No. |
Comment |
|
5
8
8
9
9
10
|
Item A: Park Wall Farm Cottages |
BH2021/02709 |
Recommendation should read: That the Committee has taken into
consideration and agrees with the reasons for the recommendation
set out below and resolves
Condition 14 re-worded to read: The cycle parking facilities shown on the approved plans shall be fully implemented and made available for use within 3 months of this decision. The cycle parking facilities shall hereafter be retained for use by the occupants of, and visitors to, the development at all times. Reason: To ensure that satisfactory facilities for the parking of cycles are provided and to encourage travel by means other than private motor vehicles and to comply with policy TR14 of the Brighton & Hove Local Plan and SPD14: Parking Standards.
Condition 17 re-worded to read: Within 3 months of this permission a Delivery & Service Management Plan, which includes details of the types of vehicles, how deliveries servicing and refuse collection will take place and the frequency of those vehicle movements shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority for written approval. All deliveries servicing and refuse collection shall thereafter be carried out in accordance with the approved plan. Reason: In order to ensure that the safe operation of the development and to protection of the amenities of nearby residents, in accordance with polices SU10, QD27 and TR7 of the Brighton & Hove Local Plan.
Condition 20 re-worded to read: Within 3 months of the date of this permission a BREEAM Building Research Establishment issued Post Construction Review Certificate confirming that the development built has achieved a minimum BREEAM New Construction rating of 'Excellent' shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority for written approval. Reason: To ensure that the development is sustainable and makes efficient use of energy, water and materials and to comply with policy CP8 of the Brighton & Hove City Plan Part One.
Condition 22 re-worded to read: Within 3 months of this permission details of the solar and photovoltaic array referred to in the Sustainability Checklist and shown on Drawing No. 17008_PL102 Rev I received on 22 January 2019 shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority for written approval. The solar and photovoltaic array shall then be installed in accordance with the approved details. Reason: To ensure that the development is sustainable and makes efficient use of energy, water and materials and has an acceptable appearance and to comply with policies CP8 and CP12 of the Brighton & Hove City Plan Part One.
Condition 32 re-worded to read: Within three months of the date of this permission a Travel Plan for the development shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority for written approval.. The Travel Plan shall thereafter be fully implemented in accordance with the approved details. Reason: To ensure the promotion of safe, active and sustainable forms of travel and comply with policies TR4 of the Brighton & Hove Local Plan and CP9 of the Brighton & Hove City Plan Part One.
Condition 33 re-worded to read: Within 3 months of this permission a Management Plan relating to the access gates, entrance doors including cycle store and 24 hour onsite security, the moving of receptacles to the bin store loading area and use of the communal lounge and communal living areas, shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority for written approval.. The use shall thereafter be managed in accordance with the approved Management Plan. Reason: To ensure the provision of satisfactory management measures for a safe and secure development and to comply with Policies CP12 and CP21 of the Brighton & Hove City Plan Part One.
|
|
29
36 |
Item B: Dolphin Court, Hove Street |
BH/2021/02934 |
Clarity required over consultee comments:
6.4 HSE: significant concern, noting that “resolving and agreeing solutions at a later stage is likely to have an impact on the layout and design, density, materials, appearance and landscape of the development, which may require a new or amended planning application.”
New paragraph:
Fire Service: no response received.
Update to final sentence of paragraph 9.38: Note - there is a fire hydrant immediately outside of the site on Vallance Road.
|
|
54 |
Item C:Land to the Rear of 28 – 30 Longhill Road |
Comment from Councillor Mears not attached to report:
“As a ward Cllr for Rottingdean Coastal I wish to object to the above planning application for the following reasons.
Planning permission has already been granted to the previous owners of the land for development of 3 bedroom properties on the site., the revised planning application now the land has been sold on is for larger 4 bedroom properties.
Each house now proposes an integral garage which in turn enlarges the footprint and encroaches more closely to the Woodland TPO and the newly designated Local Wildlife Site-Ovingdean Copse 130. The Wildlife corridor is now recognised and contains two LWS’s.
We know from The Sussex Biodiversity Record centre that there are many species of flora and forna in this area including where this site is located some of which are rare.
The incorporation of integral garages will also allows a revised site plan which is designed to free up land to the north corner of the plot, for possible further development.
Should the decision be to grant this planning application under delegated powers , I wish this planning application to go to the planning committee and reserve my right to speak.
Kind regards. Mary Councillor Mary Mears Conservative Member of Rottingdean Coastal Ward” |
|
|
112 |
Item G:79 Goldstone Crescent, Hove. |
BH2021/02943 |
Comment from Councillor Bagaeen not attached to report:
“I am writing in regarding the application in the subject line and having visited house X [redacted] on Goldstone Crescent earlier today. This application is for a major extension of house 79 next door and the way I see it, in addition to the historic issues around access, boundary wall, and rain falling off the roof at house 79 onto house X [redacted] there is a duty on us as an authority to ensure that in determining this application, no harm befalls the elderly couple at house X [redacted]. You’ll see from the pictures the very tight space between the two houses as one cause for immediate concern.
It would be good if Jack is able to go out to take a look himself.
Please also note that I have called this application to committee in case the applicant and his neighbours cannot come to an agreement on the boundary issues. I’d also lie to see detailed sections showing the boundary and the extent of works to be undertaken alongside photomontages of the extension which the portal says are there but are not unfortunately.
Many thanks, Samer”
|